Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ANNOUNCEMENT
Case Report
Case Series
Clinicodermoscopic Challenge
Clinicopathologic Challenge
Correspondence
Editorial
Faculty’s Forum
Image Correspondence
Innovations and Ideas
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Post Graduate Thesis Section
Quiz
Research Methodology and Publishing
Resident’s Forum
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ANNOUNCEMENT
Case Report
Case Series
Clinicodermoscopic Challenge
Clinicopathologic Challenge
Correspondence
Editorial
Faculty’s Forum
Image Correspondence
Innovations and Ideas
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Post Graduate Thesis Section
Quiz
Research Methodology and Publishing
Resident’s Forum
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ANNOUNCEMENT
Case Report
Case Series
Clinicodermoscopic Challenge
Clinicopathologic Challenge
Correspondence
Editorial
Faculty’s Forum
Image Correspondence
Innovations and Ideas
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Post Graduate Thesis Section
Quiz
Research Methodology and Publishing
Resident’s Forum
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Clinicodermoscopic Challenge
2 (
2
); 146-147
doi:
10.25259/IJPGD_111_2024

Flat Erythematous Lesion on Cheek

Department of Dermatology, Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya, New Delhi, India
Department of Dermatology and Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

*Corresponding author: Niharika Dhattarwal, Department of Dermatology, Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya, New Delhi, India. niharika.pgirtk@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Dhattarwal N, Bansal S. Flat Erythematous Lesion on Cheek. Indian J Postgrad Dermatol. 2024;2:146-7. doi: 10.25259/IJPGD_111_2024

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 17-year-old female presented with reddish lesion on her left cheek [Figure 1]. The lesion was noted 6–7 years ago and is non-progressive and asymptomatic. There is no history of similar lesions elsewhere or any systemic complaints. On inspection, ill-defined erythematous lesion was seen on left cheek with no surface changes. On palpation, lesion was flat, non-pulsatile and local temperature was normal.

Red coloured flat lesion present on the left cheek.
Figure 1:
Red coloured flat lesion present on the left cheek.

DERMOSCOPIC FINDINGS

On dermoscopy, multiple red tortuous capillaries are shown [Figure 2a]. On slightly pressing the dermoscope against the lesion, we noted that the lesions were blanchable [Figure 2b].

(a) Multiple red tortuous capillaries seen on dermoscopy (DermLite DL4, non-polarised, × 40) and (b) blanching of lesion seen on ‘Dermoscopic diascopy’.
Figure 2:
(a) Multiple red tortuous capillaries seen on dermoscopy (DermLite DL4, non-polarised, × 40) and (b) blanching of lesion seen on ‘Dermoscopic diascopy’.

DIAGNOSIS

Unilateral nevoid telangiectasia.

DISCUSSION

Unilateral nevoid telangiectasia is a benign, vascular disorder having superficial, clustered telangiectasias in a unilateral linear fashion. Congenital form is predominant in males; acquired form is more commonly seen in women around puberty or during pregnancy and is believed to be triggered by an elevated level of or sensitivity to oestrogen. Clinically, numerous telangiectatic macules are seen along dermatomes or Blaschko’s lines. The lesions are blanchable on diascopy.[1] Histopathologically, dilated, thin-walled endothelium-lined vessels are seen in upper and mid dermis. There is no inflammation, neoangiogenesis or aberrant malformed vessels. Dermoscopic findings concur with the histology and normal dilated capillaries with a reticulated appearance are noted.

Differential diagnoses include angioma serpiginosum, circumscribed naviform angiokeratoma, hereditary benign telangiectasia, nevus vascularis mixtus and nevus flammeus. Angioma serpiginosum are capillary malformations presenting as punctate maculopapular lesions in a linear, serpiginous pattern. These do not blanch with diascopy and show presence of multiple red oval lagoons on dermoscopy.[2]

We have described ‘dermoscopic diascopy’ of this condition in our patient. Dermoscopic diascopy is a simple technique that effectively combines two bedside tests: Dermoscopy and diascopy can be utilised for various vascular and granulomatous disorders in dermatology.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. , , . Acquired Unilateral Nevoid Telangiectasia with Pruritus and Unknown Etiology. Cutis. 2021;107:E42-3.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. . Dermoscopy as an Important Tool for Differentiating Unilateral Nevoid Telangiectasia and Angioma Serpiginosum. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2019;9:306-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections