Translate this page into:
Snail-track Ulcer of Greatest Mimicker
*Corresponding author: Ann Maria Paulose, Department of Dermatology, Institute of Naval Medicine, Indian Naval Hospital Ship Asvini, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. annmaria.p1995@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Rajput GR, Kumar A, Paulose A, Kharayat V. Snail-track Ulcer of Greatest Mimicker. Indian J Postgrad Dermatol. 2025;3:201-2. doi: 10.25259/IJPGD_76_2025
A 34-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a 1-week history of a raw lesion over the glans penis. Physical examination revealed an ill-defined, serpiginous, shallow ulcer on the glans, with a slough-covered base [Figure 1a] along with significant lymphadenopathy in the cervical, axillary and inguinal regions. The patient reported a history of unprotected sexual intercourse with multiple partners. Serological testing demonstrated a rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titre of 1:128 [Figure 1b], and the Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay was positive. Fourth-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay testing for human immunodeficiency virus antibodies was negative. The diagnosis of secondary syphilis of unknown duration was established. As per Centres for Disease Control and Prevention guideline, he was treated with weekly dosage of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million units for 3 weeks. The ulcer resolved within 2 weeks. A follow-up RPR performed 3 months later showed a titre reduction to 1:16, consistent with an appropriate serological response to treatment.

- (a) Ill-defined, serpiginous, shallow ulcer on the glans, with a slough-covered base, (b) Rapid plasma reagin titre 1:128 of same patient.
Ethical approval:
Institutional review board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent:
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.