Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ANNOUNCEMENT
Case Report
Case Series
Clinicodermoscopic Challenge
Clinicopathologic Challenge
Correspondence
Editorial
Faculty’s Forum
IJPGD Awards 2025
Image Correspondence
Innovations and Ideas
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Post Graduate Thesis Section
Quiz
Research Methodology and Publishing
Resident’s Forum
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Reviewers 2025
Short Communication
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ANNOUNCEMENT
Case Report
Case Series
Clinicodermoscopic Challenge
Clinicopathologic Challenge
Correspondence
Editorial
Faculty’s Forum
IJPGD Awards 2025
Image Correspondence
Innovations and Ideas
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Post Graduate Thesis Section
Quiz
Research Methodology and Publishing
Resident’s Forum
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Reviewers 2025
Short Communication
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ANNOUNCEMENT
Case Report
Case Series
Clinicodermoscopic Challenge
Clinicopathologic Challenge
Correspondence
Editorial
Faculty’s Forum
IJPGD Awards 2025
Image Correspondence
Innovations and Ideas
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Post Graduate Thesis Section
Quiz
Research Methodology and Publishing
Resident’s Forum
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Reviewers 2025
Short Communication
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
4 (
1
); 78-80
doi:
10.25259/IJPGD_121_2025

Eosinophilic Mastitis – A Benign Condition Mimicking Carcinoma Breast: A Case Report

Chatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj Government Medical College Satara, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Dermatology Venereology and Leprology, KEM Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Pathology, KEM Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

*Corresponding author: Dhanashree Santosh Bhide, Department of Dermatology Venereology and Leprology, KEM Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India. dsbhide@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Mahajani SA, Bhide DS, Kiruthiga KG. Eosinophilic Mastitis – A Benign Condition Mimicking Carcinoma Breast: A Case Report. Indian J Postgrad Dermatol. 2026;4:78-80. doi: 10.25259/IJPGD_121_2025

Abstract

Any lump in the breast raises suspicion of malignancy. This can be the cause of anxiety for the patients and may lead to unnecessary investigations. Awareness of this completely benign condition can help in early diagnosis of these cases. We report a rare case with isolated infiltration of eosinophils in the mammary gland and overlying skin without other organ involvement.

Keywords

Eosinophilic
Isolated
Mastitis
Mimicker
Steroids

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic mastitis is a rare benign condition that can present as an inflammatory mass with erythema, tenderness and itching. Infiltration of organs such as lungs, liver, gastrointestinal tract and skin has been reported in the literature. Infiltration of the breast tissue alone without other organ involvement is extremely rare. Eosinophilic infiltration can be associated with other diseases such as hypereosinophilic syndrome, parasitic and other infections, idiopathic granulomatous mastitis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, urticaria, asthma and peripheral eosinophilia.[1,2]

It is difficult to clinically distinguish eosinophilic mastitis from other benign and malignant breast conditions. At times, mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can also be misleading and may not help in the diagnosis. Histopathology remains the mainstay in the diagnosis of this condition.

CASE REPORT

A 37-year-old married (Gravida 1 Para 1) female presented to a general practitioner with a history of painful swelling associated with redness of the skin and itching on the left breast of 8 days duration. On clinical examination, a mobile tender mass of 2 × 2 cm was noted in the left upper outer quadrant. Overlying skin showed erythema and induration, which was more marked in the periareolar area [Figure 1a]. The left axillary lymph node was enlarged and non-tender. She was given a course of amoxycillin and potassium clavulanate 625 mg twice a day for 7 days without much improvement. However after further investigations patient was treated with oral steroids and showed complete resolution of lesions [Figure 1b]. Ultrasound (USG) was done, which showed subcutaneous oedema with fat stranding in the left breast in the upper outer and the lower inner quadrants. Underlying the lump, a large area of parenchymal fat stranding with irregular ductal dilatation was noted. Colour Doppler showed minimal vascularity without any focal collection, suggestive of mastitis. The right breast was normal. She visited a breast surgeon who added clindamycin, a combination of paracetamol, diclofenac sodium and serratiopeptidase for 7 days without much improvement. Hence, an USG-guided core needle biopsy, biopsy of the axillary lymph node and wedge biopsy of periareolar skin were performed. Blood investigations showed raised immunoglobulin E (1174.00 kUA/L) with normal absolute eosinophilic count (0.44 thou/mm3) and upper normal level of eosinophils (6.0%) on differential count. The USG-guided core-needle biopsy showed ductal ectasia and periductal infiltration of eosinophils [Figure 2a]. Skin biopsy showed infiltration of a large number of eosinophils with chronic inflammatory cells, mainly lymphocytes and macrophages, with dilatation of blood vessels [Figure 2b].

Eosinophilic Mastitis (a) Pretreatment photograph showing erythema and induration mainly in peri-aereolar area (b) Complete resolution of erythema and induration after treatment with prednisolone.
Figure 1:
Eosinophilic Mastitis (a) Pretreatment photograph showing erythema and induration mainly in peri-aereolar area (b) Complete resolution of erythema and induration after treatment with prednisolone.
(a) Photomicrograph of breast biopsy (H and E stain, 200X) showing ductal ectasia (blue star), dilated ducts (red arrows) and periductal eosinophilic infiltrate (yellow arrows), (b) Photomicrograph of skin biopsy (H and E stain, 200X) showing infiltration of eosinophils (yellow arrows), lymphocytes, macrophages with dilated vessels (red arrows). (H and E: Haematoxylin and eosin).
Figure 2:
(a) Photomicrograph of breast biopsy (H and E stain, 200X) showing ductal ectasia (blue star), dilated ducts (red arrows) and periductal eosinophilic infiltrate (yellow arrows), (b) Photomicrograph of skin biopsy (H and E stain, 200X) showing infiltration of eosinophils (yellow arrows), lymphocytes, macrophages with dilated vessels (red arrows). (H and E: Haematoxylin and eosin).

Axillary lymph node biopsy showed few lymphoid follicles with active germinal centres with foci of parafollicular expansion. There was no evidence of malignancy or Koch’s. The final diagnosis of the eosinophilic mastitis was established based on clinical and histological findings, and the patient was put on tablet Prednisolone 20 mg twice daily for 5 days and 20 mg once daily for 5 days and was asked to stop the steroids after 10 days. The lesions showed some improvement in itching and redness, but did not resolve completely. The patient came for a second opinion 15 days after stopping the steroids. On clinical examination, there was erythema and induration of the skin. There was no palpable lump. She was started on T Prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg dose till resolution of the lesion, and after that, the dose was tapered slowly over 3 months. Empirically, the patient was also given Albendazole 400 mg single dose and diethylcarbamazine 100 mg 3 times for 20 days. The patient recovered completely and has been followed up for the last 6 months without any recurrence.

DISCUSSION

Eosinophilic mastitis is a rare benign condition with an eosinophilic infiltrate in the breast tissue.[1,3] It is usually unilateral and can present with a painful, itchy mobile lump in the breast. Regional lymphadenopathy may be present. Asthma, urticaria and allergic rhinitis may or may not be associated. Peripheral blood eosinophilia is not a mandatory feature for the diagnosis.[1] There may be an allergic or immune reaction to ductal secretions, leading to infiltration by eosinophils. Activation and degranulation of eosinophils leads to the release of cytotoxic inflammatory proteins, causing the clinical symptoms.

The gold standard for the diagnosis is histopathology. Histopathology can help to distinguish eosinophilic mastitis from other conditions such as hypereosinophilic syndrome and Churg-Strauss syndrome. The differences are mentioned in Table 1. Other tests which aid in the diagnosis are USG, mammography, MRI and immunohistochemistry markers. However, the vascular, lymphatic, ductal and tissue changes on USG and MRI may be similar in carcinoma and eosinophilic mastitis and may lead to misdiagnosis. The mainstay of treatment is oral steroids in a dose of 0.5 mg/ kg until the remission is achieved and then tapered slowly. Antihistamines can be supplemented.

Table 1. Differences between eosinophilic mastitis and other conditions
Histopathological differentiating features Eosinophilic Mastitis Other conditions like hypereosinophilic syndrome, Churg Strauss
Infiltrate Predominently eosinophils Mixed-eosinophils, lymphocytes, histiocytes or Langerhan’s cells
Neutrophilic background Absent Present
Location of infiltrate Periductal Limited to lobules

In our case, we report a rare presentation of eosinophilic mastitis without peripheral blood eosinophilia and without involvement of other organs.[1,4]

CONCLUSION

Eosinophilic mastitis is a rare inflammatory condition mimicking carcinoma of the breast. Awareness about this benign condition will help in avoiding unnecessary investigations and radical treatment. Treatment with oral steroids gives good results.

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , . Eosinophilic Mastitis: A Rare Benign Inflammatory Condition and Review of the Literature. J Surg Case Rep. 2022;2022:rjac456.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. . A very Rare Case of Eosinophilic Mastitis. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018;49:251-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Eosinophilic Mastitis in a Lactating Breast. Pathology. 2021;53:549-50.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Isolated Eosinophilic Mastitis Mimicking Carcinoma: A Rare Case Report from Syria. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024;125:110585.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections